Heathen Hangout

In association with:    The Heathen Hub
(a community for discussion, open to all, whether theist or atheist or whatever)

and also a link to the unconnected
  Freethought and Rationalism Discussion Board (FRDB)
and also the unconnected
  Think Humanism board


Go Back   Heathen Hangout > The public side of the Heathen Hangout (Public subforums) > Anything else serious
Here you can choose in which
style you wish to view the HH:


 
   
       
All about the HH Register Arcade Recreations Room The  HH   FAQ
Zoints Search Tags Other Site Content - Blogs, Wiki etc. Mark Forums Read

Anything else serious Like it says, for anything else serious

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20-Nov-2007, 01:00 AM (01:00)   #51
Christina
Always determined to be difficult
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 865
Default

I would love to see Sultanist as a mod. His in-thread warnings would be hilarious and go on for pages.
Christina is offline  
Old 20-Nov-2007, 01:08 AM (01:08)   #52
BigBlue2
Secretly Titled
 
BigBlue2's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 859
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnet View Post
You're an evil, EVIL person, BigBlue.
Ta muchly



Ein Hoch auf unsere apostolische kaiserlich-königliche Majestät, Kaiser Franz-Joseph von Österreich-Ungarn!

Religion: Stupidly decrepit, utterly unrealistic, and terrifyingly dogmatic. What's not to love?
BigBlue2 is offline  
Old 20-Nov-2007, 03:38 AM (03:38)   #53
A Dead Relative
The Official Courier
 
A Dead Relative's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Island of Misfit Toys
Posts: 2,600
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christina View Post
...50,000 should make you a dead ancestor.

Preying on Sundaes, since 1972.
A Dead Relative is offline  
Old 20-Nov-2007, 06:10 AM (06:10)   #54
lpetrich
Moderately Intelligent Designer
 
lpetrich's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lebanon, OR, USA
Posts: 672
Default

This just in: The Other Loren (L. Pechtel) is now at 50,032, and premjan now at 29,911.

However, IIDB has retired "Elder" and now has these rank names and thresholds:

Newcomer - 0
Regular - 100
Veteran - 500

which is its original scheme under different names.
lpetrich is offline  
Old 20-Nov-2007, 01:02 PM (13:02)   #55
Don Alhambra
Involved in drama but innocent, scientifically
 
Don Alhambra's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada
Posts: 4,371
Default

I honestly never minded the original scheme. Nor did I particularly mind the 'user' tag. I think that got blown up out of proportion a bit.

"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it." -- Max Planck
Don Alhambra is offline  
Old 22-Nov-2007, 11:49 PM (23:49)   #56
David B
Pesistant as tillerman, even when sorely puzzled
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wales
Posts: 393
Default

Yes, it did get blown out of proportion.

By the powers that be.

Pharisaical bastards, as some of them are.

David B
David B is offline  
Old 23-Nov-2007, 01:14 PM (13:14)   #57
hecaterin
Junior Member
 
hecaterin's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 20
Default

It's not the tag that's the problem, it's the accompanying attitude of contempt.
hecaterin is offline  
Old 23-Nov-2007, 01:52 PM (13:52)   #58
Christina
Always determined to be difficult
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 865
Default

Yeah. The tag thing was ridiculous. There is no problem for the nonprofit in calling people 'members' of the forum and as far as I can see the whole issue was contrived for no other reason than to be dismissive. If they really believed it was a problem then they're either utter amateurs or too lazy to ask an attorney. Being a member of the corporation requires a legal agreement and obviously none were in place.
Christina is offline  
Old 23-Nov-2007, 02:25 PM (14:25)   #59
SwordOfTruth
Liberated sword!
 
SwordOfTruth's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 223
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christina View Post
Yeah. The tag thing was ridiculous. There is no problem for the nonprofit in calling people 'members' of the forum and as far as I can see the whole issue was contrived for no other reason than to be dismissive. If they really believed it was a problem then they're either utter amateurs or too lazy to ask an attorney. Being a member of the corporation requires a legal agreement and obviously none were in place.
They had a lawyer on staff when rigorist was a mod. About this specific issue their approach pretty much seems to be "It's the way we've always done it and it's the way it's gonna be!", with no willingness to change. Not too lazy to ask an attorney; it wouldn't have been tough for them to say "rigorist, what ya think?" at one point in time. He gave free legal advice more than once to IIDB, so it's not like they didn't do that. Rather, it was more a distinct lack of desire to change how they refer to the user community. IOW, amateurs.
SwordOfTruth is offline  
Old 23-Nov-2007, 02:37 PM (14:37)   #60
Christina
Always determined to be difficult
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 865
Default

I didn't know rigorist before all this blew up. At one point when I realized that he knew a lot about nonprofits I sent him a PM to vent about how bizarrely they were behaving as board members. I think he's great, and they should have availed themselves of his knowledge instead of patronizing him.

And he tells great jokes ; )
Christina is offline  
Old 23-Nov-2007, 03:21 PM (15:21)   #61
Garnet
Zen Mistress: Loves you for your mind not just your body
 
Garnet's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 2,892
Default

rigs is one of my favorite people...and he's a damned good lawyer. I ain't sayin' how I know that. ;)
Garnet is offline  
Old 23-Nov-2007, 05:19 PM (17:19)   #62
Christina
Always determined to be difficult
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 865
Default

You should invite him to the new forum. I bet he'd have a lot to contribute in terms of making theists feel comfortable.
Christina is offline  
Old 23-Nov-2007, 07:32 PM (19:32)   #63
Garnet
Zen Mistress: Loves you for your mind not just your body
 
Garnet's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 2,892
Default

I might do that. I suspect, though, that rigs has a bit of forum burnout given that he rarely posts anymore, and when he does, it's pretty much a one liner.
Garnet is offline  
Old 11-Feb-2008, 12:53 AM (00:53)   #64
David B
Pesistant as tillerman, even when sorely puzzled
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wales
Posts: 393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gurdur View Post
I'm going to make some suggestions here to all IIDB members users.

I am also making a thread on Suggestions To The IIDB Admin Team, and that other thread will be up in 15 minutes' time.
______

Helpful Suggestions To All The IIDB Users.
  1. Never ever accept small concessions with humble and grateful thanks, and with wildly unrealistic hopes.
    .
    • What the history of the IIDB admin culture has very definitely shown over the last five years is an increasing attitude of contempt for moderators and members users of the IIDB. And they have been confirmed in their contempt for you.
      .
    • Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
      .
    • And then: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
      .
    • The same people: Maverick, The Other Michael, Rob the Mediancat, Don Morgan, these people have learnt that if they throw a few crumbs to you, whether you are an IIDB moderator or an IIDB user, that you will sit up and beg and be very grateful in a very fetching pose of listening to His Master's Voice in your hi-fidelity. Time and time again, you've all been fobbed off with only the promise of a small concession, and history (links above) time and time again has always shown over the last 5 years that after allowing a brief period of venting by everyone, then the reactionary crackdown just starts all over again, and you're worse off than before.
    .
  2. Sweat the small stuff. The only way you would ever win anything out of this conflict is by organization and pressure, and a strike only wins when it hurts. OK, there's been some pain caused by some of the self-bannings, but not enough to sway the II BOD and those who really control the IIDB admin group. But now right at this time you have that rarest of phenomena happening, a genuinely spontaneous wildcat strike walk-out by certain IIDB moderators and at least one admin.
    .
  3. Use it or lose it; if you let this opportunity go, you're buggered forever after. Sweat the small stuff; start making valid but small complaints,since it all adds to the general pressure, and it makes the strike hurt. Insist on having matters settled ASAP.
    .
  4. But big stuff is better than small stuff. Try making valid complaints which are really valid. Make them significant, factual and solid.
    .
  5. Stick to your guns. Look at Jacey's complaint about RBH using "shitstirring" in regard to the "members users" issue. Jacey was simply consquential and honest, and he stuck to his guns. He won the point and match. Normally he would have been told to fuck off and die; this time the field was in his favour, and he stuck to the field.
    .
  6. Be consequential and honest: make your points valid, no matter how small the point is. An invalid complaint only serves to confirm paranoia and arrogance on the other side; it only serves to increase contempt for you. Don't try playing the Emo Game; that only leads to despair on your side and ineffectuality.
    .
  7. Be at least semi-organized; get in while everyone else is. Wait a while, and your opportunity is lost, and you're only one individual left standing like a lonely shag on a rock.
    .
  8. Don't be bloody stupid. Personal abuse and vandalism again only serve to confirm paranoia and arrogance on the other side. Vandalising the Wikipedia article on the IIDB, or calling the poor admin "shitheads", only gets you bagged as a loser who has deserved to be a loser. Be graceful to the opposition when you are sure you can afford to be. Be effective, don't be emo.
    .
  9. Always think one step ahead at least: how is the oppostion going to reply to you? What is your planned reply to the opposition's planned reply, before you even make your first move?

    There was that marvellous little Q&C thread where a poster said he hoped the IIDB burnt down. Predictably, the IIDB admin answering laughed it off with a small joke about thanking the poster for his rational reponse. The poster immediately came back with a fairly-well argued and calm reply about all the perceived faults in IIDB at this time, and built a reasonably solid argument -- then repeated the line about it burning down. IOW, what looked like a really bloody stupid emo rant got turned by the poster very damned quickly into quite a good riposte to the IIDB admin answering. Not the path I would have taken myself, but a reasonable job of rhetoric and then added calm description of facts saving the day on that one. Not a great example, but it will serve for the nonce.
.
So much for IIDB users and moderators (and let's be blunt, for all the praise showered upon the IIDB moderators every now and then, what has become very clear is that they are held in as much contempt as the average users by certain IIDB admin and II BOD people).

Now to make my thread on Suggestions For The IIDB Admin, and that will be up in 15 minutes.

Links to be added to this OP later.
________________

Please cross-reference this thread with this one and this one.
__________________________

IIDB crisis associated threads Tracking Thread here
Prophetic, in a way, but subsequent avents have exonerated most of the admins (Mediancat excepted)

We lost. And, in a perverse sort of way, won as well, insofar as we have found better places, in our own individual ways.

RnR has strengths that iidb lacked, at a price.

Here, and at the Hangout, there are strengths that iidb lacked, at lesser price.

Both, in their ways, with strengths iidb lacked.

IIDB has lost.

Lots of good admins, lots of good mods, lots of good posters, lots of vilification around the secular web, as opposed to The Secular Web.

David B (is rereading this thread as a result of a link Gurdur posted tonight somewhere, and apologises for thread necrophilia)

Pain after pain I stood it just to see how it feels
Rain after rain I stood it just to make it real
David B is offline  
Old 15-Feb-2008, 07:40 PM (19:40)   #65
Shake
Defensor Paganorum
 
Shake's Avatar
 
Flash Space Invaders Champion! Animal Rescue Champion! Bikini Bounce Champion! Pluckys Snowball Bash Champion!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Folding@Home in upstate NY, USA
Posts: 6,326
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Alhambra View Post
I honestly never minded the original scheme. Nor did I particularly mind the 'user' tag. I think that got blown up out of proportion a bit.
I agree. More to follow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christina View Post
Yeah. The tag thing was ridiculous. There is no problem for the nonprofit in calling people 'members' of the forum and as far as I can see the whole issue was contrived for no other reason than to be dismissive. If they really believed it was a problem then they're either utter amateurs or too lazy to ask an attorney. Being a member of the corporation requires a legal agreement and obviously none were in place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwordOfTruth View Post
They had a lawyer on staff when rigorist was a mod. About this specific issue their approach pretty much seems to be "It's the way we've always done it and it's the way it's gonna be!", with no willingness to change. Not too lazy to ask an attorney; it wouldn't have been tough for them to say "rigorist, what ya think?" at one point in time. He gave free legal advice more than once to IIDB, so it's not like they didn't do that. Rather, it was more a distinct lack of desire to change how they refer to the user community. IOW, amateurs.
Well, I'm actually kind of glad this got revived. I had some PM conversation with one of the admins regarding a recent reposting of the rules, etc., which came to be about the whole 'user'/'member' debate. The very short, Readers' Digest version of the answer I got was that 'member' has some legal ramifications which were not justified. Also, as it was put to me, The SecWeb provided the service of IIDB and that technically, those of us not on the BoD actually really are just 'users' of the forum and its software.

Otherwise, things seem to be running pretty smoothly over there right now. I actually even saw an accusation of someone trolling there which had gone unedited. Perhaps no one reported it, or perhaps the mods just missed it. Or perhaps since the one being accused didn't have a problem with it, they just left it alone (as I would have were I on staff).

<This space for rent>

The OUT Campaign
Shake is offline  
Old 16-Feb-2008, 03:01 AM (03:01)   #66
Don Alhambra
Involved in drama but innocent, scientifically
 
Don Alhambra's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kingston, ON, Canada
Posts: 4,371
Default

I suspect that it's easy for things to run smoothly when anyone who might upset things is banned.
Don Alhambra is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:43 AM (10:43).


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright is asserted for the Heathen Hangout by its owner.